Every week, The Post runs a collection of letters of readers’ grievances — pointing out grammatical mistakes, missing ...

Empowering an unelected billionaire to dismantle federal agencies is illegal and unconstitutional. But who will stop him?

Danielle Sassoon’s American bravery. Plus: Susan B. Glasser on Putin’s great day in Washington; Stephen A. Smith for ...

The problem goes beyond the political leanings of judges to the speed of change and the administration’s apparent willingness ...

Expression has never been more convenient. Censorship has never been easier.  From research papers on arXiv to mukbang videos ...

As Donald Trump shamelessly stretches the boundaries of the law to expand his power and influence, America’s federal judges ...

Justice Riggs and the North Carolina State Board of Elections, which also wanted federal courts to decide the matter, could still petition for the full appeals court to hear the case. Separately ...

But, depending on the outcome in state courts, the matter could still go before a federal tribunal. On Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order that ...

With a compliant Congress and mostly quiet streets, the president’s opponents are turning to the judicial branch with a flurry of legal actions. But can the courts keep up? By Mattathias ...

The ruling left open the possibility that federal courts might take the issue back up if state courts don't adequately resolve it. Griffin has declined to comment on the case, saying judges ...

If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command ...