Art Schallock, a World War II veteran who collected three World Series rings pitching with the New York Yankees in the 1950s, has died at 100. Schallock had been MLB’s oldest-living player since ...
Daniel Martin Diaz's merges metaphysical, scientific, and technological phenomena into vibrant geometric compositions.
The launch of GPT-4o inspired a rash of A.I.-generated Studio Ghibli-style images. They may bode worse for audiences than for ...
Clara Lacy's 'The World Has Dropped Its Petals' is a series of elaborately detailed drawings illuminating the world of ...
The restock has come at a great time, with the Amazon Spring Sale in full swing, there are plenty of hot sets to pick up ...
The once highly respected—and now disgraced—art advisor Lisa Schiff has been sentenced to 30 months in prison for defrauding clients out of an estimated $6.5 million. Through a multimillion ...
A federal appeals court ruled that art created autonomously by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted, saying that at least initial human authorship is required for a copyright.
Cathy Nunez never imagined that a handful of sand would shape her destiny. When she left the Philippines for the UAE in 2013, her mother, Ciony, had one question: "What kind of job will you have ...
If you buy something from a Polygon link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement. Clayton Ashley, senior video editor, has been producing and editing videos for Polygon since 2016.
March 18 - A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback