The Agency Is Looking to Sackett v. EPA for a More ‘Durable’ Definition - From Obama to Trump to Biden, each of the last ...

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency once again will revisit a controversial rule to define streams and wetlands ...

“The Biden Administration, with its costly and burdensome WOTUS rule, created confusion, uncertainty, and hardship for ...

Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court ...

On March 4, 2025, in City & County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Clean Water Act does not authorize “end-result” provisions in National ...

The state's seven year old septic system reimbursement program has proved inaccessible for some lakeside communities in ...

The Trump administration announced a wave of regulatory rollbacks on Wednesday including a repeal of Biden-era emissions ...

The Supreme Court began its new term Monday with a new justice on the bench, the public back in the courtroom and a spirited debate in a case that pits environmental protections against property ...

The Supreme Court dealt another blow to federal environmental protections on Tuesday in a major water pollution case. In a 5–4 ruling in City and County of San Francisco v. EPA, the justices ...

Wisconsin DNR seeks public input on water quality assessment guide updates, including PFAS focus and method changes.

San Francisco argued that Clean Water Act permits should function like recipes that restrict specific ingredients in a dish, rather than telling cooks not to make the dish too salty.

A plan by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin to fire scientists could disrupt environmental rules focused on clean air and water ...