Local retired judges and attorneys spoke Wednesday to clarify how the U.S. government works. Attorney Mark Bryant and former ...

The White House says court rulings going against the Trump administration are coming from “judicial activists” on the bench ...

Alan Charles Raul was associate White House counsel under President Ronald Reagan and general counsel of the Office of ...

JD Vance’s statement was correct — and should not be controversial: a district court order barring Trump’s oversight of the ...

The term “constitutional crisis” gets overused. But Vice President JD Vance seems to be inviting one.

In the annals of American history, periods of political turbulence and constitutional challenges are not unprecedented.

Advertisement If the president's authority to make personnel decisions in the executive branch is subject to judicial veto, ...

Vice President J.D. Vance has errantly suggested that federal judges have no right to review executive branch actions.

Trump and his allies are continuing to question judicial oversight of the executive branch, ramping up criticism of judges who've put some of his agenda on pause.

The legal showdowns over President Donald Trump’s removals could ultimately end with expanded executive branch power, legal ...

Legal challenges are slowing, but not halting, Trump’s executive orders; experts view these as procedural hurdles, not insurmountable barriers.

The most likely response by a court if the administration were to defy its edict would be to hold the agency acting in defiance of an order or ruling in civil contempt, which would allow a judge to ...