JD Vance’s statement was correct — and should not be controversial: a district court order barring Trump’s oversight of the ...

The term “constitutional crisis” gets overused. But Vice President JD Vance seems to be inviting one.

In the annals of American history, periods of political turbulence and constitutional challenges are not unprecedented.

Advertisement If the president's authority to make personnel decisions in the executive branch is subject to judicial veto, ...

Elements of the judicial branch, including public defender offices, have been caught up in the Trump administration’s ...

Vice President J.D. Vance has errantly suggested that federal judges have no right to review executive branch actions.

When the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in the 1832 case Worcester v. Georgia, so the story goes, President Andrew ...

President Donald Trump has been critical of federal judges who've moved to block some of his most contentious actions, such ...

The legal showdowns over President Donald Trump’s removals could ultimately end with expanded executive branch power, legal ...

Legal challenges are slowing, but not halting, Trump’s executive orders; experts view these as procedural hurdles, not insurmountable barriers.

The most likely response by a court if the administration were to defy its edict would be to hold the agency acting in defiance of an order or ruling in civil contempt, which would allow a judge to ...

For legal thought leaders to throw their hands in the air in resignation over Trump's actions is a form of capitulation in ...