Supreme Court rejects bid by CNY native, Trump donor to overturn landmark decision
The 1964 case found that public figures in defamation suits must show that a statement is not only false, but was published with “actual malice,” meaning the publisher either knew it was untrue or acted with reckless disregard to the truth. The court declined to hear the case in a brief order without comment, according to the Associated Press.
A high-stakes election for the Wisconsin Supreme Court has become the most expensive judicial election in American history, ...
Justice Samuel Alito expressed interest in reconsidering a ruling issued by the Supreme Court over 20 years ago.
The Supreme Court declined to wade into the thorny First Amendment question surrounding the scope of the 1964 defamation ...
The Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause gives defendants in criminal cases the right to “be confronted with the witnesses ...
The Supreme Court has ruled that states can force compliance with an extradition request, but Louisiana’s case presents a ...
Attorney Joe Dinolfo has announced his candidacy for the New York State Supreme Court in the Seventh Judicial District, which ...
GOP megadonor Steve Wynn had urged the court to revisit the precedent established by 1964’s New York Times v Sullivan ...
The Supreme Court on Friday sided with federal prosecutors who moved to tack extra prison time onto the sentence of a ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback