whether the Second Amendment applies against the States. (See slip op. at 48 n. 23). By issuing nationwide injunctions against executive action, federal district courts are exercising too much power.

In 2008, the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller gave teeth to the Second Amendment, holding that the “right of the people to keep and bear Arms” did, in fact ...

One of the first clashes of the debate came over the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, the case that said the Second Amendment protected an individual’s right to own ...

In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court stated that types of arms protected by the Second Amendment are not limited to those in existence at the time the Amendment was ratified ...

In Heller v. District of Columbia (2008), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to own guns, rather than the collective right of a state to have a militia.

Bruen’s ruling built upon the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller, in which Justice Antonin Scalia said Second Amendment guarantees only apply fully to “ordinary” or “responsible” law ...

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), joined by the National Rifle Association (NRA), has filed a joint amicus brief with ...

Heller held that handguns in general are in common use by law-abiding persons for lawful purposes, rendering the District ... ranges have Second Amendment protection, as Ezell v.

Since then, Duncan v. Becerra has been up and down the ladder from the district court to ... "arm," it must be in common use. Heller stated that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to ...